JVAS announces awards - Four best research articles (one each from basic, production, para-clinical and clinical subjects) and one best short communication will be adjudged for awards each year!!!

Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences

Volume: 52 Issue: 2

  • Open Access
  • Research Article

Assessment of quality in specific fractions of Large White Yorkshire boar semen

K. G. Ambily1*, Malati Naik2, Hiron M. Harshan1, C. Jayakumar1, M. P. Unnikrishnan3 and A. P. Usha3

1. Department of Animal Reproduction, Gynaecology and Obstetrics, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Mannuthy, Thrissur-680651, Kerala. Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, India

2. Veterinary College, Gadag, Karnataka

3. Centre for Pig Production and Research, KVASU, Mannuthy

*Corresponding author, email: [email protected]. , Ph: 8281519522

Year: 2021, Page: 155-160, Doi: https://doi.org/10.51966/jvas.2021.52.2.155-160

Received: Jan. 4, 2021 Accepted: March 1, 2021 Published: June 1, 2021

Abstract

Boar semen is voluminous and ejaculated as jets or fractions of pre-sperm, sperm rich (SRF) and post-sperm rich fractions. Recent studies have reported more resilient characteristics of sperm in initial portions of SRF towards cold shock and cryopreservation. The present study was conducted to assess the quality of specific fractions of SRF, namely, first 10mL of SRF (F1) and rest of SRF (F2) in Large white Yorkshire (LWY) boar semen. Ejaculates were collected using gloved-hand technique and were subjected to quality assessments of volume, pH, sperm progressive motility, concentration, plasma membrane integrity, abnormality, acrosome integrity and sperm membrane cholesterol. Upon statistical analysis, significant differences were noticed in volume, pH, sperm concentration and sperm membrane cholesterol between fractions of the ejaculate.

Keywords: Boar semen, sperm rich fraction, F1, F2

References

Campbell, R. G., Hancok, J. L. and Rothschild, L. 1953. Counting live and dead bull spermatozoa.J. Exp. Biol. 30: 44.

Cerovsky, J., Frydrychova, S., Lustykova, A. and Rozkot, M. 2005. Changes in boar semen with a high and low level of morphologically abnormal spermatozoa.J. Anim. Sci. 50: 289-299.

De Ambrogi, M., Ballester, J., Saravia, F., Caballero, I., Johannisson, A., Wallgren, M., Andersson, M. and Rodriguez-Martinez, H. 2006.Effect of storage in short and long-term commercial semen extenders on the motility, plasma membrane and chromatin integrity of boar spermatozoa.Int. J. Androl. 29: 543-552.

Frunza, I., Cernescu, H. and Korodi, G. 2008. Physical and chemical parameters of boar sperm.Lucrariştiinłifice Med. Vet.41: 634-640.

Gadella, B.M. and Harrison, R.A.P. 2002. Capacitation induces cyclic adenosine 3′, 5′-monophosphate-dependent, but apoptosis-unrelated, exposure of aminophospholipids at the apical head plasma membrane of boar sperm cells. Biol. Reprod.67 : 340-350.

Garner, D. L. and Johnson, L. A. 1995. Viability assessment of mammalian sperm using SYBR-14 and propidium iodide.Biol.Reprod. 53: 276-284.

López Rodríguez, A., Rijsselaere, T., Vyt, P., Van Soom, A. and Maes, D., 2012.Effect of dilution temperature on boar semen quality.Reprod. Dom. Anim. 47: 63-e66.

Kumaresan, A., Siqueira, A.P., Hossain, M.S. and Bergqvist, A.S. 2011. Cryopreservation-induced alterations in protein tyrosine phosphorylation of spermatozoa from different portions of the boar ejaculate. Cryobiology: 137-144.

Leahy, T. and Gadella, B.M., 2015.New insights into the regulation of cholesterol efflux from the sperm membrane.Asian J. Androl.17:561.

Mann, T. and Lutwak-Mann, C. 1981. Male reproductive function and the composition of semen: general consideration in themes and trends in physiology, biochemistry and investigative andrology, Springer Verlag, Berlin. 364 .

Parks, J. E. and Lynch, D. V. 1992. Lipid composition and thermotropic phase behaviour of boar, bull, stallion, and rooster sperm membranes. Cryobiology.29: 255–266.

Pena, F. J., Johannisson, A., Wallgren, M. and Rodriguez Martinez, H. 2003. Assessment of fresh and frozen thawed boar semen using an annexin-v assay: a new method to evaluate sperm membrane integrity. Theriogenology.60: 677–89.

Salisbury, G. W., Van Denmark, N. L. and Lodge, J. R. 1985. Physiology of reproduction and artificial insemination of cattle, 2nd edn, CBS Publishersand Distributors, Shahdara, New Delhi, India. pp. 286–328.

 

Saravia, F. 2008. Cryopreservation of boar semen: impact of the use of specific ejaculate portions, concentrated packaging, and simplified freezing procedures on sperm cryosurvival and potential fertilising capacity. Doctoral thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, 63p.

Saravia, F., Wallgren, M. and Rodríguez-Martínez, H. 2010. Freezing of boar semen can be simplified by handling a specific portion of the ejaculate with a shorter procedure and MiniFlatPack packaging. Anim. Reprod. Sci.117: 279-287.

Shylesh, T. 2019. Storage quality of liquid semen ofLarge white yorkshire boar supplemented with cholesterol loaded cyclodextrin. M.V.Sc thesis, Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, 65p.

Siqueira, A. P., Wallgren, M., Hossain, M. S., Johannisson, A., Sanz, L., Calvete, J. J. and Rodriguez-Martinez, H. 2011. Quality of boar spermatozoa from the sperm-peak portion of the ejaculate after simplified freezing in MiniFlatpacks compared to the remaining spermatozoa of the sperm-rich fraction. Theriogenology.75: 1175-1184.

Watson, P. F. 1975. Use of Giemsa stain to detect changes in acrosome of frozen ram spermatozoa.Vet. Rec. 97: 12-15.

Wilson, M. 2018. Freezability of boar semen supplemented with sodium dodecyl sulphate in low or high sperm concentration doses. M.V.Sc thesis, Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, 98p.

Zlatkis, A., Zak, B. and Boyle, A. J. 1953. A new method for the direct determination of serum cholesterol. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 41: 486-92

Cite this article

Ambily, K. G., Naik, M., Harshan, H. M., Jayakumar, C., Unnikrishnan, M.P. and Usha A.P. 2021. Assesment of quality in specific fractions of Large White Yorkshire boar semen. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 52(2): 155-160.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.51966/jvas.2021.52.2.155-160

Views
139
Downloads
43
Citations