JVAS announces awards - Four best research articles (one each from basic, production, para-clinical and clinical subjects) and one best short communication will be adjudged for awards each year!!!

Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences

Volume: 52 Issue: 1

  • Open Access
  • Research Article

Screening of sub-clinical mastitis in dairy cows of organised farms using three diagnostic tests

M. G. Amritha Priya1, K. Vijayakumar1, K. Vinodkumar1, K. Justin Davis1, G. Radhika2

1. Department of Veterinary Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Mannuthy, Thrissur-680651. Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Pookode, Wayanad

2. Centre for Advanced Studies in Animal Genetics and Breeding

*Corresponding author: [email protected]

Year: 2021, Page: 73-76, Doi: https://doi.org/10.51966/jvas.2021.52.1.73-76

Received: Aug. 11, 2019 Accepted: Nov. 8, 2019 Published: Jan. 1, 2021

Abstract

The present study was envisaged for the detection of subclinical mastitis in 108 apparently healthy dairy cows of University Livestock Farm, Mannuthy and Livestock Research Station, Thiruvazhamkunnu. The quarter milk samples collected under sterile conditions were screened using California mastitis test, somatic cell counting and electrical conductivity. A high prevalence of 54 per cent was recorded in the present study. The results indicated the importance of maintaining proper hygienic practices inside farm and good udder health management to enhance quality milk production.

Keywords: Subclinical mastitis, Screening tests, Prevalence study, Thrissur district.

References

Hoque, M.N., Das, Z.C., Talukder, A.K., Alam, M.S. and Rahman, A.N.M.A. 2015. Different screening tests and milk somatic cell count for the prevalence of subclinical bovine mastitis in Bangladesh. Trop. Anim. Hlth. prod. 47:79-86.

Islam, M.A., Rahman, A.K.M.A., Rony, S.A. and Islam, M.S. 2010. Prevalence and risk factors of mastitis in lactating dairy cows at Baghabari milk shed area of Sirajganj. Bangladesh J. Vet.Med.8:157-162.

Kamphuis, C., Sherlock, R., Jago, J., Mein, G. and Hogeveen, H. 2008. Automatic detection of clinical mastitis is improved by in-line monitoring of somatic cell count. J. Dairy Sci. 91:4560-4570.

Langer, A., Sharma, S., Sharma, N.K. and Nauriyal, D.S.2014.Comparative efficacy of different mastitis markers for diagnosis of sub-clinical mastitis in cows. Int.J. Appl. Sci. Biotechnol. 2:121–125.

More, S.J., 2009. Global trends in milk quality: implications for the Irish dairy industry. Irish Vet. J. 62:S4-S5.

Panchal, I., Sawhney, I.K. and Dang, A.K.2016. Relation between electrical conductivity, dielectric constant, somatic cell count and some other milk quality parameters in diagnosis of subclinical mastitis in Murrah buffaloes. Indian J.Dairy Sci. 69:453-462

Polat, B., Colak, A., Cengiz, M., Yanmaz, L.E., Oral, H., Bastan, A., Kaya, S. and Hayirli, A. 2010. Sensitivity and specificity of infrared thermography in detection of subclinical mastitis in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 93:3525-3532.

Pyorala, S. 2003. Indicators of inflammation in the diagnosis of mastitis. Vet.Res. 34:565-578.

Sargeant, J.M., Leslie, K.E., Shirley, J.E., Pulkrabek, B.J. and Lim, G.H. 2001. Sensitivity and specificity of somatic cell count and California Mastitis Test for identifying intramammary infection in early lactation. J. Dairy Sci.84:2018-2024.

Raj, 2017. Acute phase proteins in serum and milk as diagnostic tools in bovine subclinical mastitis. M.V.Sc thesis, Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Pookode, 91p.

Sharma, N., Pandey, V. and Sudhan, N.A. 2010. Comparison of some indirect screening tests for detection of subclinical mastitis in dairy cows. Bulgarian J. Vet. Med. 13:43-54

Smith, K.L., 1999. Suggested interpretation of mastitis terminology. Bull.Int.Dairy Fed. 338:3-26.

Cite this article

Amritha Priya, M. G. , Vijayakumar, K., Vinodkumar, K., Justin Davis, K., and Radhika, G. 2021. Screening of sub-clinical mastitis in dairy cows of organised farms using three diagnostic tests. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 52(1): 65-72.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.51966/jvas.2021.52.1.73-76

Views
123
Downloads
104
Citations